Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 0:27:47 GMT -5
Its critics, lies in what concerns the equality of spaniards before this specific law . In other words, depending on whether a citizen is in one or another autonomous community, the (subjective) criteria for assessing his or her dependence according to the (objective) degrees of the same, are extraordinarily variable. On the other hand, in some autonomous communities co-payment is required for services provided , for example, in nursing homes, while in other communities it is not required. - the second problem of the law descends to the most practical. In principle, the law contemplated as an exceptional case the payment to relatives who take care of other relatives of theirs in a state of dependency. However, when applying the law, more than sixty percent of the aid that is financed is aid in the family sphere , with the consequent change of emphasis on the will of the legislator, the lack of generation of the expected employment (a third of the total) and a decrease in the quality of the services provided, because they are only semi-professional.
The current mechanics of the law have to accentuate these behaviors in many cases: people prefer to receive money - generally around 500 euros per month - for taking care of a family member, rather than sending them to a residence that, in in many cases, it Special Database requires them to pay the co-payment. Likewise, the social security contribution of those 500 euros earned is very low, and the pertinent administrative controls are lacking in the assistance process . Thus, the paradox arises that, as the nursing home 'lobby' has denounced, in some autonomous communities places, public or subsidized, in these homes have been reduced. - the third problem deals with financing and dysfunctions of the autonomous state. Far from limiting themselves to paying 50%, the autonomous communities are paying an average of 70%. Since aid is always calculated per patient, in some cases, the central administration only pays 5% per patient . And the state has failed to fulfill its financing promises, structured around a “minimum level” and a “variable level”, depending on the problems to be addressed.
It is with the “variable level” that the central state fails to comply. At the same time, the law's financing needs are suffering given the government's budget cuts: in 2009, the planned 1.2 billion euros were increased by 800 under plan e and other expansions of the spending ceiling; in 2010, the planned expenditure is only 1.6 billion euros, despite the fact that in this year there is a gap between the 750,000 people evaluated and entitled to benefits and the 500,000 people actually receiving these benefits . It happens that, in some communities, such as andalusia, evaluation opinions are more lax. In short, there are more and more dependents and less and less money. - another point pointed out by the experts is the lack of a dependency prevention policy , above all the gerontological plan, now subsumed in the general treatment of dependency. Likewise, the ministry of trinidad jiménez has reduced all social and family policy items in order to maintain the dependency law .According to sources from la moncloa to which el confidencial digital has had access, the president of the government returned from the swiss city literally scared by the future forecasts regarding the spanish economy that were heard there. And he came to the conclusion that “international speculators” were seeking the collapse of spain.